Wednesday, August 11, 2010

The BENZ 50kW- High Performance

 From MyWindPowerSystem Ltd.
The BENZ 50kW 
High Performance - Direct Drive
Permanent Magnet Generator Wind Turbine System 
 
 


Available from: MyWindPowerSystem Ltd.
                           http://www.mywindpowersystem.com/products

Features:
With automatic yaw control, speed control and pitch control for blades.

This amazing Direct Drive, Permanent Magnet Wind Turbine is specially designed for low and medium wind speeds and applies the latest design in wind turbine technology.

The direct drive, permanent magnet design guarantees reliable performance, efficiency, convenient transport easy installation and most importantly, very low maintenance.

Tuesday, August 10, 2010

Human Poo-Powered Vehicle Hits the Road


The Bio-Bug runs on methane gas 
generated from processing waste materials 

[From CBS News Here]

     Spare the jokes about Dung Beetles but the first methane-powered vehicle from Volkswagen made its official debut today on the streets of Bristol, England. The car, a 2 liter VW Beetle convertible, can drive 10,000 miles a year on the equivalent of the solid waste that 70 homes generate over the course of 12 months. If the car runs out of compressed methane, the system switches back to gasoline. 

     Fad or the future? At this point, that's hard to say though Geneco, the U.K. company which oversaw the conversion project, believes it's only a matter of time before methane from sewage sludge can become a popular alternative energy source for cars. (The Bio-Bug was built by the Greenfuel Company, which converts gasoline-based cars to run on liquefied petroleum gas.) In its press release, Geneco points out that more than 11,500 vehicles in Sweden run on biomethane made from sewage plants. It also notes that India and China use compressed natural gas to fuel their vehicles. But the idea still remains a novelty in the UK and virtually non-existent in the United States. 

     Geneco, which operates one of Britain's biggest sewage treatment works, put out a statement quoting the company's general manager, Mohammed Saddiq explaining how the increased production of bio gas will accelerate the growth in this still-nascent market.

     "Waste flushed down the toilets in homes in the city provides power for the Bio-Bug, but it won't be long before further energy is produced when food waste is recycled at our sewage works," he said. "It will mean that both human waste and food waste will be put to good use in a sustainable way that diverts waste from going to landfill."

     And why choose a Volkswagon Beetle for the proof-of-concept prototype in the first place? That was the contribution of a group of students who took part in a workshop, according to Siddiq.
"They thought it would be appropriate that the poo-powered car should be the classic VW Beetle Bug because bugs naturally breakdown waste at sewage works to start the treatment process which goes on to produce the energy," he said.

Tuesday, June 23, 2009

Major Solar Project for Barstow Region

Public voice concerns, questions about solar project

By Jessica Cejnar, Desert Dispatch

BARSTOW • Representatives from local businesses, higher education, conservation groups and individual residents asked questions and gave their opinions on a proposed solar power project that will be built east of Newberry Springs.

Tessera Solar and Stirling Energy Systems transported two busloads of people 37 miles down Interstate 40 to the proposed site for their Calico-Solar One power project Monday afternoon. What is now an empty stretch of desert may soon house 24,000 to 34,000 mirrored solar dishes. The proposed project will have the capability of generating between 500 and 850 megawatts of electricity, powering up to 425,000 homes. The site visit was followed immediately by a public hearing.

Tessera representatives said they estimate needing 100 to 700 workers during construction, which is planned for late 2010, and 140 full time workers once the project is complete. About 75 percent of those workers will be local, they said.

The proposed 8,200-acre facility is bordered by the Cady Mountains to the North and the Pisgah Crater Area of Environmental Concern to the east. When folks were given an opportunity to step off the busses, their concerns ranged from road access to air and water pollution to concerns about potential impacts to endangered species. People were also concerned with how many jobs this project would bring the community.

“People in the Greater Barstow community have a very earned suspect about energy companies based on past experiences,” said Yermo resident Joe Orawczyk, referencing Hinkley’s prior experience with Pacific Gas and Electric.

Orawczyk visited the site on his own Saturday and did his own research in addition to perusing Tessera Solar’s application for certification that was submitted to the Bureau of Land Management and California Energy Commission. He brought almost 19 pages of questions and comments with him to the meeting.

Among Orawczyk’s concerns was whether or not Tessera’s project would deplete the underground aquifer.

“The water table is 310 feet below (ground),” he said. “My concern is that the aquifer will run out eventually.”

Jeff Aardahl, California representative for Defenders of Wildlife, recommended additional analysis be done on the impacts the project could have on the desert tortoise and desert big horn sheep populations.

“Data needs to be much more detailed and disclosed to the public,” he said.

Not everyone was concerned about the projects, Allen Malloy was there in the hopes of developing a relationship between Tessera and the company he works for, Goodspeed Distributing, a fuel and lubricant supplier based in Hesperia.

Malloy and Goodspeed lubricant Sales Manager Jaime Diaz said they hope that instead of getting their fuel and lubricant needs from another company outside of the high desert, Tessera Energy will work with them.

“Our sales dollars go a long way in the community,” Malloy said. “If there’s an opportunity for my company to grow, we will try to make that business relationship (work).”

For those who weren’t able to make the public hearing and want to comment about the project, they can e-mail their comments to docket@energy.state.ca.us. The docket number for the project is 08-AFC-13.

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

Where Have All The Subsidies Gone?

This is from the group called:

Where Have All The Subsidies Gone?

by mjohnston on March 24, 2009

I saw a legislator on CNN yesterday talking about how renewable energy gets a huge amount of money in government subsidies and how that ought to be taken away. That made me wonder just how much fossil and nuclear fuels receive in subsidies and how much Exxon raked in while we were all paying 4$ a gallon for gasoline during their 14 billion dollar profit quarter last year.

I found a page from the Energy Information Agency which explains subsidies and gives some handy charts and general figures in relation to type of energy production and how much each got in federal money. If you look at just the total amount received Refined Coal is the obvious champ taking in 2.156 billion dollars with Nuclear a close runner up at 1.267 billion.







In the above chart it looks as though renewables got the biggest share but you have to remember that there are many types of energy production included under the general heading of “renewables”. Things such as Ethanol, Biomass, Solar and Wind are all lumped together in the chart while Coal, Petroleum and Nuclear are given separate categories. If we lump all traditional (fossil/nuclear) fuel sources together and compare that figure to the conglomerate “renewables” it is apparent that traditional fuels definitely got the lions share of available government handouts.

Renewables: 4.875 Billion

Coal/Oil/Nuclear: 7.162 Billion

I did not factor end use subsidies into this on either side because they can apply to either type of fuel in the form of energy conservation efforts, etc.

Clearly traditional energy sources were the big winner in total dollars collected in the form of government subsidies. So the next time someone starts crying about alternative energy subsidies you will know what they aren’t saying…

Monday, March 23, 2009

Dr. Patrick G. Hatcher


Dr. Patrick G. Hatcher


Batten Endowed Chair in Physical Sciences, Professor of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Faculty Director of the College of Sciences Major Instrumentation Center, Executive Director of the Virginia Coastal Energy Research Consortium

Education:

Ph.D. in Chemistry, University of Maryland, 1980
M.S in Marine Chemistry, University Miami, 1974
B.S.in Chemistry, N C State University, 1970

Research Interests:

The Hatcher Group's research is in the area of environmental chemistry and geochemistry, emphasizing the origin and chemical transformations of plant-derived biopolymers in natural systems such as soils, peats, marine sediments, and oceanic waters. Other interests include the studies of the interaction of organic contaminants with natural organic matter in soils, sediments, and natural waters; The studies of the sequestration of nitrogen in the environment; Defining the origin, nature, and reactivity of black carbon (soot, charcoal, etc.) in the environment; and conversion of algae biomass to biodiesel.

Personal Website:

Location:

Office: Physical Sciences Building Room 3100-C
Laboratory: Physical Sciences Building Room 3103A & 3103E

Contact Information:

Dr. Patrick G. Hatcher
Old Dominion University
Physical Sciences Building
4402 Elkhorn Avenue
Norfolk, VA 23529

Office phone: 757-683-6537
Laboratory phone: 757-683-4807
Fax number: 757-683-5310

e-mail: phatcher@odu.edu

Virginia Coastal Energy Research Consortium


Virginia Coastal Energy Research Consortium


VCERC was created by the VA legislature in 2007 and first received funds from the Commonwealth in fiscal year (July 1st 2007-June 30th 2008). Since July 2007 VCERC has developed coastal energy technologies and the Virginian knowledge base to assist the Commonwealth in meeting the targets set out in the VA Energy Plan. VCERC’s ongoing efforts impact three key VA Energy Plan objectives: creation of renewable energy resources; improving the environment; and economic development.

Specifically, VCERC provides the research and development required for the commercialization and implementation of renewable energy by using algal biomass, wind and wave resources available in Virginia. Algal biomass energy removes pollutants from Chesapeake Bay, represents an innovative win-win wastewater remediation-biofuel production technology, and avoids utilizing food crops, trees, and other valuable natural resources to produce fuel. Project expansion in algal biofuels and wind power will lead to spin-off industry, creating jobs, investment and lowering fuel prices in Virginia.

The VA General Assembly set out key energy policy statements and objectives. In reference to VA energy policy, VCERC’s efforts will:

  • Facilitate development of energy sources that are less polluting of the Commonwealth’s air and water, and … do not contribute to greenhouse gases and global warming
  • Foster research and development of alternative energy sources that are competitive at market prices
  • Develop energy resources and facilities that do not impose a disproportionately adverse impact on economically disadvantaged or minority communities
  • Increase VA’s reliance on agricultural-based ethanol and biodiesel from crops grown in the Commonwealth
  • Ensure that energy generation and delivery systems are located in places that minimize impacts to pristine natural areas and other significant onshore natural resources, and that are as near as possible to compatible development

The Consortium is governed by a board which consists of fourteen members - with representatives from each of the eight partner universities and six government and industry partners. The Consortium is located at Old Dominion University in Norfolk.

City looks at algae as possible fix for wastewater problems

from Desert Dispatch

City looks at algae as possible fix for wastewater problems

Comments 5 | Recommend 2

Biofuel and fertilizer produced as byproducts

BARSTOW • The solution to the city’s problems with the groundwater contamination around Soapmine Road could come in the form of green algae.

Mayor Joe Gomez is floating the idea of partnering with Southern California-based developer Brad Ducich and a group of Virginia-based researchers to create an operation in which ponds full of green algae would eat the nitrates from contaminated water while the algae is harvested to make biofuels and fertilizer. The treated water could then be pumped back into the ground to flush out the contaminated groundwater.

Ducich and Dr. Patrick Hatcher, a professor of chemistry and biochemistry at Old Dominion University and executive director of the Virginia Coastal Energy Research Consortium, were in Barstow Friday to talk to stakeholders including the mayor, Councilman Tim Saenz, and residents of the Soapmine Road area.

The prospect could have the city and Soapmine Road residents on the same side of the table for once.

The city is under orders by the Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board to come up with a remediation plan for the Soapmine area groundwater. The water board determined that the high level of nitrates in the groundwater was caused by the city irrigating a field to the west of the Soapmine Road area with treated wastewater from the city’s wastewater plant for about two decades prior to 2004.

Soapmine Road resident Christina Byrne, who has been vocal on the groundwater issue, said residents are excited by the idea of using algae in the cleanup.

“The neighborhood is very optimistic,” she said. “I’m optimistic, I’m happy.”

Algae is not being used commercially for wastewater treatment currently, Hatcher said, but Virginia Coastal Energy Research Consortium and several other groups are currently conducting pilot projects pairing biodiesel production with wastewater remediation.

Al Darzins, group manager of the National Bioenergy Center at the National Renewable Energy Lab, which has put many years of research into algae-based fuels, said algae has a higher energy content and yields a far higher amount of oil per acre than other plants used for biofuels. But with the fuel costing an estimated $10 a gallon or more to produce, it is not yet cost effective, he said.

Hatcher said that with the production costs being offset by selling byproducts like fertilizer, the actual cost per gallon of biofuel could be $1.50 to $2 a gallon.

The idea of using algae for wastewater remediation in Barstow is still very much in the initial phases and will need to go to the City Council before it moves forward, Gomez said.

First Step Plus LLC, a company owned by Ducich, already has a conditional use permit to develop 34 acres on Interstate 40 by the Daggett airport into a truck stop. Now, Ducich said, he is looking at putting an algae farm on the property and selling biofuel as well as regular fuel there.

Ducich said he hopes to begin construction in the next six months.

Contact the writer:
(760) 256-4123 or asewell@desertdispatch.com

Sunday, September 14, 2008

Assembly Candidate Sees Jatropha Tree as a Key to Barstow’s Future

Desmond Farrelly
Democratic candidate for the 34th AD,
holds a jatropha plant and seeds that
could bring new agriculture to Barstow.







Assembly candidate sees

Jatropha tree as

a key to Barstow’s future

September 12, 2008 - 3:44PM
(Article Truncated)

BARSTOW — Desmond Farrelly massaged a leaf of a young jatropha plant and talked about Barstow’s future.


Part of the 34th Assembly district Democratic nominee’s platform is developing alternative fuel sources and wean California off oil, and Farrelly thinks he found a winner in the obscure jatropha tree.


“I picked up seeds in South Asia 10 years ago, and who knew that it would be a need today,” he said. “This is the future of Barstow. This is the future of desert communities.”


Jatropha is a green, leafy tree that can grows in less than ideal soils around the world. Popular in tropical deserts in Mexico and Southeast Asia and China, the plant produces seeds that contain a high content of oil. When refined, the oil can be used a fuel, said Mark Hodson, a vice president of business development and investor relations at the Los Angeles-based biofuel firm Global Clean Energy. His company maintains about 5,000 acres of jatropha trees in the Yucatan region of Mexico.


“It’s certainly a fantastic fuel source,” Hodson said. “It’s a very tough plant.”


Domestic farming and use of jatropha is small, but the plant has been popular in India, China, Southeast Asia and South America for a while. Hodson said the plant requires little water, can sustain draughts, loves the sunlight and does not require a lot of nutrients to grow. Hodson’s company is looking to bring the crop into Southern California. Farrelly said it sounds like the perfect plant to weather Barstow’s conditions.


The only drawback, according to both, is that jatropha cannot withstand frequent frosts. The High Desert winters would spell trouble for the tree. However, Farrelly said his strain, grown on a farm in Stockton for about 10 years now, is frost resistant. Hodson said his coming is developing frost resistant strains as well.


In addition to producing a renewable fuel source, Farrelly is hoping jatropha can bolster Barstow’s economy. Growing the plant will produce jobs, processing and refining the oil will produce jobs and selling the fuel to trucks and trains will produce jobs, he said. Hodson, too, said the tree will bring jobs to areas where nothing could take seed.


FACT FILE
30 to 40 years a jatropha tree can live
31% to 37% oil content in a jatropha seed
$42 to $45 cost of a barrel of refined jatropha biofuel
$102 cost of a barrel of oil as of Friday
Sources: Global Clean Energy, The Associated Press

Did you know?
A jatropha fruit, or nut, is inedible and toxic. Mark Hodson of Global Clean Energy said this means food crops will not be sacrificed for jatropha. Other jatropha experts, however, worry that processing jatropha could produce a toxic vapor harmful to workers.
Sources: Global Clean Energy, Reuters


Contact the writer:
(760) 256-4121 or aaron_aupperlee@link.freedom.com

Sunday, July 20, 2008

Why we should pray for $10 per gallon gas!

This is an excellent piece because it talks about an issue that nobody else seems to be addressing in the energy consumption equation. As a society that is addicted to consumerism, that addiction is being threatened by our other addiction of oil consumption. Every barrel of oil that is consumed in energy and transportation use is a barrel of oil that will never be able to be used for they myriad of products that are already based on petrochemicals.

In this piece, Dale Lerch, a chemical engineer makes the point that future generations will be denied the ability to discover or use countless yet undiscovered products that could very well be the products that are desperately needed for the survival of our planet.

Thank You Dale for this post (and for allowing me to re-post it). Good job!

Why we should pray for
$10 per gallon gas!

By Dale Lerch


First, some basic facts:

In 2007, the United States had 4.5% of the total world's population (303 million / 6.707 billion; Wikipedia).

In 2007, the United States consumed 26% of the total world's energy usage (gas, oil, hydroelectric; World Almanac).

In 2007, approximately 2 billion folks in the world live without electricity.

Now to oil:

Since I was educated as a chemical engineer, I've come to understand that oil -- that tarry black liquid that for which we are fighting a war in Iraq -- is the very most versatile building block of chemistry. Hydrocarbons make plastics, carbon fibers stronger than steel for aircraft and cars, medicines, and probably 5000 more important products still undiscovered. Every year we learn how to make over 200 new fantastic products and chemicals from oil. In short, oil will be the very most important resource for the well-being of your great-grandchildren!

And what are we doing with it? WE ARE BURNING IT UP TO DRIVE TO THE MALL! I liken it to heating your house in winter by burning your family's heirlooms.

Now on to $10 gas:

Unlike the rest of the world, Americans absolutely refuse to make use of energy efficient modes of transportation like public transportation. Why? Because we've pursued a reckless policy of guaranteeing cheap energy prices for over 50 years -- all with dire future consequences:

1) Because of this faulty policy, when oil was selling for $2/barrel, our policies (tax, incentives, etc.) protected domestic oil producers from competition from other world sources. If we were smart, we'd have sealed our oil wells in those days, and pumped as much oil as possible from other world sources. And we now have a president and vice-president who have the same "Texas oilman's mentality" (if you can to stretch a bit to provide them with this compliment) that was the basis of past failed policies.

2) We have the most costly transportation system in the world! It is based on autos & freeways, whereas India, Mexico, China have widespread and low-cost public transportation systems. The net effect? Manufacturers have to pay their employees enough money to get to work. So guess who ends up being the high-cost manufacturer in the world? You got it right if you said US! After World War II, we became rich as the world's manufacturer because we were the ONLY kid on the block who had facilities not destroyed by war. WE AIN'T THE ONLY KID ON THE BLOCK NO MORE! So no wonder that everything you buy at Wal-Mart is no longer "Made in U.S.A."

3) Europe, which has subsidized public transportation for generations with highly taxed gasoline is now prepared to weather high oil prices for one reason -- they're used to it! They've been paying over $4/gallon for years, building a vast system of trains, trolleys and buses with those gasoline taxes. Their infrastructure is in place to handle high energy costs. Ours is not. Yet we hear neither presidential candidate talk about this critical need for our country. Why? Because Americans are bellyaching about $4 gas and are prepared to vote for whichever candidate promises to keep guaranteeing cheap energy! And, instead of praying for guidance for our presidential candidates to confront the needed hard choices that face us, one church group was reported last week holding prayer vigils at a gas station praying for lower gas prices. I'm not surprised; the Pope once insisted the world was flat!

4) The price of oil is based on increasing world demand, and not some bogeyman lurking in the shadows of Wall Street. Yes, speculators temporarily drive up prices, but only because they are predictors of future prices. If they have bet wrong, prices will fall fast. However, FOR THE LONG TERM, THEY AIN'T WRONG FOLKS! All those products you bought at Wal-Mart last week made someone on the other side of this world a bit richer -- someone who now can afford to take that Sunday drive. This is good! It's why free-trade is good for the world. But, it also makes them want a slightly larger slice of the world's energy usage. Seems fair to me when we use 5 times as much as anyone else. But that slight increase in THEIR slice means higher oil prices because the world just doesn't have the capacity to match it in oil refining at this time. (We've known about this limitation for years, have given oil corporations unbelievable tax breaks, yet not a single refinery has been constructed in the U.S. in the last 32 years!)

So what is the solution? You got it, $10 gas! The sooner, the better! Last month, for the FIRST TIME IN 50 YEARS, AMERICANS CUT BACK ON ENERGY USAGE, and not just mildly. When gas hits $5 per gallon -- and it will before the end of this summer or next summer at the latest -- we'll do more. Imagine the clamor for extending the Bay Area Rapid Transit system (BART) to the San Joaquin Valley when it hits $10 -- something once considered "a waste of taxpayer dollars" just a few years ago. And maybe too we might just vote for someone who promises higher taxes for developing and investing in new clean energy sources.

I CAN'T WAIT! Maybe, just maybe, we’ll have some oil left at a reasonable price for your great-grandchildren to enjoy some of those yet undiscovered 5000 new products made from oil!

Friday, July 18, 2008

Water Powered Automobile

CBS Sunday Morning - Blowin In The Wind

This is a piece that CBS ran on their Sunday Morning Show called; "Blowin In The Wind." It profiles how wind turbines are changing the landscape of West Texas as it has already become the forth largest wind energy producer behind Germany, Spain, and India.

No Carbon Footprint: Solar / Hydrogen Home

This is truly "The Solution" for renewable energy systems for commercial and residential use.

Integrating Wind Energy And Farming



Constructing a Wind Turbine

The Aptera Car



The Algae Answer For Our Energy Needs

In this video Glen Kertz with Valcent Products talks about a "Closed Loop Photo Bio Reactor" which is the term used to describe how we can use algae to make biofuels.




Find more videos like this on PickensPlan